Jacques Talbot's Kitchen
Riverdale · Bronx · British · $$

Cut Style
Shoestring
Cooking Method
Double-fried
Oil Type
Canola
Price
$$
Sauce Compatibility
Location
Riverdale, Bronx · 40.8842, -73.9038
Critical Assessments
“The shoestring fry at Jacques Talbot's Kitchen represents a kitchen with convictions. The exterior is aspirational. The interior is present as a rumor. The canola does not call attention to itself. The grease is generous in the manner of a host who means it. Convictions, in this guide's estimation, are the prerequisite for anything worth eating. One does not return. This information is provided without judgment.”
“One does not seek drama at Jacques Talbot's Kitchen. One seeks fries. The shoestring format is a declaration of intent, and the kitchen largely honors it. The crispness is aspirational. The potato flavor emerges mid-experience, which is somewhat later than ideal but not without its own logic. The grease content is generous in the manner of a host who means it. The napkin earns its keep. This guide recommends visiting without expectations and departing, perhaps, with adjusted ones. This guide recommends the fries and nothing else. This is sufficient.”
“One does not arrive at Jacques Talbot's Kitchen lightly. The shoestring fry presents itself with the quiet confidence of a thing that knows its own worth. The double-fry technique is evident in the exterior: aspirational. The interior potato character is present as a rumor. The grease is generous in the manner of a host who means it. This guide notes the address. The neighborhood offers alternatives. One should not investigate them.”
“The question of the ideal french fry has occupied this guide for some years. At Jacques Talbot's Kitchen, one arrives closer to an answer. The shoestring fry, double-fried in canola, presents crispness that is aspirational and a potato interior that is present as a rumor. The grease is generous in the manner of a host who means it. Proximity to an answer is, in this case, sufficient. One proceeds. One is glad one did.”
Christina's Note
One has been. One has formed an opinion. One has moved on.
